Restricted duty hours for surgeons and impact on residents quality of life, education, and patient care: a literature review

  • Hans-Christoph Pape1 and

    Affiliated with

    • Roman Pfeifer1Email author

      Affiliated with

      Patient Safety in Surgery20093:3

      DOI: 10.1186/1754-9493-3-3

      Received: 05 December 2008

      Accepted: 20 February 2009

      Published: 20 February 2009

      Abstract

      Background

      Work-hour limitations have been implemented by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) in July 2003 in order to minimize fatigue related medical adverse events. The effects of this regulation are still under intense debate. In this literature review, data of effects of limited work-hours on the quality of life, surgical education, and patient care was summarized, focusing on surgical subspecialities.

      Methods

      Studies that assessed the effects of the work-hour regulation published following the implementation of ACGME guidelines (2003) were searched using PubMed database. The following search modules were selected: work-hours, 80-hour work week, quality of life, work satisfaction, surgical education, residency training, patient care, continuity of care. Publications were included if they were completed in the United States and covered the subject of our review. Manuscrips were analysed to identify authors, year of publication, type of study, number of participants, and the main outcomes.

      Review Findings

      Twenty-one articles met the inclusion criteria. Studies demonstrate that the residents quality of life has improved. The effects on surgical education are still unclear due to inconsistency in studies. Furthermore, according to several objective studies there were no changes in mortality and morbidity following the implementation.

      Conclusion

      Further studies are necessary addressing the effects of surgical education and studying the objective methods to assess the technical skill and procedural competence of surgeons. In addition, patient surveys analysing their satisfaction and concerns can contribute to recent discussion, as well.

      Background

      Resident work-hour restrictions have been implemented nationwide under the guidelines established by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) in July 2003 [1]. The main goal of this regulation is to improve patient safety and quality of care due to reduction of fatigue related medical adverse events. Numerous investigations previously demonstrated an association between the reduction in cognitive and manual skills induced by fatigue or sleep deprivation. These were thought to be associated with a high risk of medical errors in various subspecialties [26]. On the other hand, surgical experience (high case load) is known to be significantly associated with decreased complication rates and medical errors [710]. One may therefore argue that the limitation of work-hours during the surgical/orthopaedic residencies may negatively impact the education and technical competence. The effects of this regulation on surgical education and quality of patient care continue to be debated. In this review, studies published following the implementation of the ACGME reform are summarized. Data on effects of limited work-hours on the quality of life, surgical education, and patient care is presented, focusing on residents in surgical subspecialties.

      Methods

      Literature Search

      To identify the relevant publications, a Medline database search of articles published following the implementation of ACGME guidelines (July, 2003) through PubMed was performed. Relevant studies were retrieved using the following sequences of key words: work-hours, 80-hour work week, quality of life, work satisfaction, surgical education, residency training, patient care, continuity of care. Synonyms were used to find further relevant literature. In addition, we reviewed the references from the resulting publications to identify further potential articles to be included in our study.

      Selection of Relevant Manuscripts

      Studies were included that assessed the effects of work-hour limitations on residents quality of life, surgical education, and the quality and continuity of patient care, respectively. Publications were selected if they covered at least one subject of our review and were completed in United States. Review articles, textbook chapters, poster presentations, and abstracts were exluded from this study. Studies were eligible if they were prospective, retrospective, or descriptive.

      Analysis of relevant Papers

      A total of twenty-one articles satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this analysis. We reviewed and summarized the findings published in the studies. Variables of interest included authors, year of publication, type of study, number of participants, and the main outcomes.

      Quality of life

      Resident work hour regulations have been implemented in the State of New York during the 1980s [11]. It was reported that a majority of surgical residents experienced improved quality of life as a result of these work hour limitations [12, 13]. Prior the nationwide implementation of ACGME requirements on resident duty hours, a survey performed by Whang and colleagues [13] characterized the perceptions and desires of surgical residents on the work hour reform. In this study, 81% of the respondents reported that sleep deprivation and the abusive work environment have negatively affected their work. Moreover, the majority of surgical residents supported work hour limitations and believed that the new regulation would have positive effects on the quality of their personal life [13]. Following the implementation, numerous investigations confirmed the anticipated improvements of residents quality of life (Table 1) [1420]. According to the surgical residents, the regulation has had a positive impact on the lifes outside of the hospital; namely more time for reading, rest, time spent with their families and responsibilities apart of work [17]. Improved moral and decreased fatigue were also reported and mentioned as positive aspects [14, 16, 17, 20]. Interestingly, a different perception was found between junior versus senior residents with senior residents being less enthusiastic and more dissatisfied with the new regulation [14, 16]. The authors assumed that the internalized culture of surgery and transfer of work from junior to senior residents following the regulation affected the opinion of senior resident surgeons. Although not specifically mentioned, it is assumable that the differences in the daily activities may play a role. While junior residents are mainly involved in floor work, writing discharge summaries, and general patient care, senior residents spend a higher amount of time in the operating room and are learning the surgical profession and the skills required.
      Table 1

      Summary of studies analysing the impacts on surgeon's personal life

      Personal Life

      Improved

      No Change

      Worsen

      Source

      Outcome

      Source

      Outcome

      Source

      Outcome

      Basu et al, 2004[14]

      A 68-item survey of plastic surgery residents (n = 12)

      Resident quality of life and morale had improved

      Gelfand et al, 2004[21]

      Pre-post survey of residents (n = 37) and faculty members (n = 27)

      No changes in emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation, and personal accomplishment, no significant changes in residents burnout

      _

      _

      Chung et al, 2004[15]

      Pre-post survey of surgical residents.

      Improvements in fatigue-related issues, more work satisfaction, improvement of lifestyle

      _

      _

      _

      _

      Kort et al, 2004[16]

      Survey of general surgery residents (n = 164)

      Increased personal time and decreased fatigue at work, more time for family, senior residents were less enthusiastic than junior residents

      _

      _

      _

      _

      Stamp et al, 2005[17]

      Pre-post survey of surgical residents (n = 28)

      More time for rest, time with family, and socializing

      _

      _

      _

      _

      Hutter et al, 2006[18]

      Survey of surgical residents (n = 58) and surgical attending physicians (N = 58), web based MBI survey(Burnout)

      Decreased burnout scores, less emotional exhaustion, improved quality of life, increased motivation to work

      _

      _

      _

      _

      Immerman et al, 2007[19]

      Survey of opinions and attitudes of orthopaedic residents (n = 976) and program directors (n = 85)

      There was an overall agreement that the quality of life had improved

      _

      _

      _

      _

      Schneider et al, 2007[20]

      Pre-post evaluation of operative case logs, standardized scores, residents perception survey

      Substantial improvements of residents satisfaction and quality of life

      _

      _

      _

      _

      One publication reports emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation among most residents before and after introduction of work-hour reduction, whereas, important clinical activities such time spent in the operating room, clinic, and making rounds did not changes as well [21].

      In summary, almost all investigations have reported improved quality of life and work-related satisfaction in surgical residents. However, most authors agree that the working conditions cannot be improved by reducing work-hours only. It is concluded that due to limited work time, the work load should be distributed to colleagues or auxiliary staff (physician extenders).

      Education

      Surgery is a procedure – based specialty requiring the acquisition of technical skills and procedural competence. This experience depends on the variety of cases and case load during the residency. Several surveys have demonstrated improvements in theoretical surgical education with a significant increase of American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores as a consequence of additional time for reading, more time for self preparation, and for conferences [12, 14, 19, 20]. Surprisingly, other studies did not find changes in operative volume and number of cases performed either by senior or junior residents after reduction of work-hours (Table 2 and Table 3) [17, 18, 2126]. These findings appear to demonstrate that fewer work-hours do not jeopardize the volume of procedures and with it the procedural experience of surgical residents. However, there may be issues in terms of the appropriate documentation of the procedures. Also, most studies do not differentiate between the difficulty of the procedure (removal of hardware versus open reduction and internal fixation). Also, one may wonder if the 80 hour work rule has been violated and has remained undetected.
      Table 2

      Summary of studies analysing the impacts on surgeon's education (Part 1)

      Education I

      Improved

      No Change

      Worsen

      Source

      Outcome

      Source

      Outcome

      Source

      Outcome

      Basu et al, 2004[14]

      A 68-item survey of plastic surgery residents (n = 12)

      More time for general reading, preparation for operative cases, and for presenta-tions and for conferences

      Gelfand et al, 2004[21]

      Pre-post survey of residents (n = 37) and faculty members (n = 27), and work-hour regist,

      No significant changes in operating room hours, clinic time, and duration of rounds

      Chung et al, 2004[15]

      Pre-post survey of surgical residents, determination of program components

      Fewer consultations seen, reduced conference attendance, and reduced operation per week.

      Immerman et al, 2007[19]

      Survey of opinions and attitudes of orthopaedic residents (n = 976) and program directors (n = 85)

      Especially junior residents perceived that the new regulation has a positive effect on surgical education

      Ferguson et al, 2005[24]

      Pre-post study analysing surgical operative logs of residents in general surgery, restrospective review

      The residents operative volume could be maintained, the operative volume was unchanged

      Jarman et al, 2004[27]

      Pre-post study of general surgery residents, review of operative logs

      Work-hour restrictions result in a significant decrease in operative experience

      Schneider et al, 2007[20]

      Pre-post evaluation of operative case logs, standardized scores, residents perception survey

      Substantial increase of operative cases in PGY1 and PGY2,

      ABSITE Score improved

      Malangoni et al, 2005[25]

      Pre-post study of work-load and work-hours, senior residents survey at level I trauma center

      The number of operation performed by senior residents did not changed, no difference in trauma patient care exposure or operative case load

      Kort et al, 2004[16]

      Survey of general surgery residents (n = 164)

      The majority felt that their operative experience was reduced

      _

      _

      Mendoza and Britt, 2005[23]

      Mixed-design study of 253 programs, survey of residents, determination of operative volume

      No significant differences in the operative volume of residents

      Cohen-Gadol et al, 2005[29]

      Nationwide survey of program directors (n = 93) and residents (n = 617)

      61% of residents noted that the new guidelines have had negative effect on their training

      _

      _

      Spencer and Teitelbaum, 2005[22]

      Pre-post study and survey of residents (n = 91) on pediatric surgery

      No significant changes in total number of cases per day for junior and senior residents,

      residents perception of their education did not changed

      Myers et al, 2006[28]

      Pre-post survey of general surgery residents (n = 200) at 5 academic medical centers

      Decrease in the evailable opportunities for bedside learning. The quality of education may have declined

      Table 3

      Summary of studies analysing the impacts on surgeon's education (Part 2)

      Education II

      Improved

      No Change

      Worsen

      Source

      Outcome

      Source

      Outcome

      Source

      Outcome

      _

      _

      Stamp et al, 2005[17]

      Pre-post survey of surgical residents (n = 28)

      Residents felt that their training has not been affected significantly

      Peabody, 2006[30]

      Survey of orthopaedic program directors (n = 94) and senior residents (N = 59)

      The respondents thought that the regulation had a negative impact on orthopaedic residency education

      _

      _

      Hutter et al, 2006[18]

      Survey of surgical residents (n = 58) and surgical attending physicians (N = 58), ACGME case logs, ABSITE Score

      Resident training and education objectively were not statisticaly diminisched (ACGME case logs, and ABSITE Score)

      _

      _

      _

      _

      Pappas and Taegue 2007[26]

      Pre-post evaluation of case-log database. Single university based orthopaedic residency program

      The new regulation has not decreased the experience of orthopaedic residents

      _

      _

      Many clinicians argue that such work hour limitations adversely affect the training experience and report reduced quantity of operations, reduced consultations seen, and reduced conference attendance [15, 27, 28]. This opinion was also reflected in surveys of surgical residents [16, 29, 30]. Kort et al [16] surveyed the resident perceptions of the impact of work-hour restrictions. In this study, the majority (57.3%) of the residents felt that restricted work-hours reduced their operative experience due to a reduction in the case load. Especially senior residents negatively judge the new work-hour regulation and expect adverse effects on surgical education [16].

      In summary, it is still controversial whether the restricted work hours negatively influence the surgical education and training. The new regulation reduces the duration of stay in the hospital and may lead to fewer opportunities to participate in operative cases. Thus, less experience may ensue for the surgeon in training. Further observations and objective evaluations of the surgical education can indicate whether the ACGME work-hour policy has adversely affected the clinical experience. Certainly, the estimation of ABSITE scores is an objective method to analyze the theoretical education of surgical residents. Unfortunately, the degree of surgical experience, procedural competence, and technical skills are difficult to assess. Therefore, it has been tried to use analyses of surgical adverse events, mortality, and morbidity to assess operative skills [8, 3133].

      Patient care

      The ACGME work-hour regulation caused the development of shift models with multiple residents being responsible for a given patient [34]. Thus, it has been discussed that the continuity of patient care may be compromized due to the lack of familiarity with patients. Numerous surveys studying resident perceptions performed prior and after the implementation of the work-hour reform have demonstrated that surgical residents and program directors expect adverse effects on the quality and continuity of patient care (Table 4) [13, 15, 16, 28, 29]. In this context, previous investigations found that the reduction of work-hours (from 12 to 8 h) in the ICU resulted in an increased frequency of complications and readmissions [35]. Other investigators report an association of cross-coverage in patient care with complications of medical therapy and preventable adverse events [36]. However, there is a lack of studies that demostrate advese effects in surgical patients after the new work-hour regulation. In addition to the analysis of surveys, several authors used objective methods (Mortality, Morbidity, Complication rates, and Missed Injuries) to evaluate the impact on quality of patient care [18, 20, 3740]. In an recent study, Morrison et al [39] found a slight decrease of mortality and morbidity amoung trauma patients in university hospitals. Previous investigations have demonstrated that the mortality and morbidity most likely did not change following the implementation of the new work regulation [18, 37, 38]. Studies performed in the ICU support the results mentioned above and demonstrate a lower rate of serious medical errors and decreased attentional failures due to elimination of extended work shifts [41, 42].
      Table 4

      Summary of studies analysing the impacts on quality of patient care

      Patient care

           

      Improved

      No Change

      Worsen

      Source

      Outcome

      Source

      Outcome

      Source

      Outcome

      Basu et al, 2004[14]

      A 68-item survey of plastic surgery residents (n = 12)

      Residents noted an improved ability to deliver patient care, hight consensus that this policy is benefitial for patient care

      Rogers et al, 2005[40]

      Pre-post study of complications, missed injuries, delayed diagnoses, and admission rates

      No significant difference in the overall complication rate, delayed diagnoses, or missed injuries

      Chung et al, 2004[15]

      Pre-post survey of surgical resident

      The new regulation reduced continuity of care, reduced consultations seen

      _

      _

      Hutter et al, 2006[18]

      Prospective study of mortality, complication rates, NSQIP

      No significan difference in quality of patient care, no differences in mortality rates

      Kort et al, 2004[16]

      Survey of general surgery residents (n = 164)

      Continuity and safety of care were perceived negatively by surgical residents

      _

      _

      Schneider et al, 2007

      Pre-post evaluation of operative case logs, standardized scores, residents perception survey

      Patient outcome measures, including monthly mortality and number of admissions showed no changes

      Cohen-Gadol et al, 2005[29]

      Nationwide survey of program directors (n = 93) and residents (n = 617)

      93% thought that the new reform has had a negative impact on continuity of patient care.

      _

      _

      Shetty et al, 2007[37]

      Pre-post study of mortality rates in 551 community hospitals (n = 1.511.945 patients)

      In surgical patients there were no significant changes of mortality rates

      Myers et al, 2006[28]

      Pre-post survey of general surgery residents (n = 200) at 5 academic medical centers

      Errors related to reduced continuity of care significantly increased. The continuity of care had decreased a lot.

      _

      _

      Volpp et al, 2007[38]

      Pre-post study of mortality rates in 3321 nonfederal hospitals (n = 8.529.595 patients)

      The new reform was not associated with either significant worsening or improvements of mortality

      _

      _

      _

      _

      Morrison et al, 2008[39]

      Retrospective pre-post study of mortality, length of hospitalisation Data from NTDB

      This analysis demonstrates slightly decreased mortality and morbidity rates. But more likely clinically not important

      _

      _

      According to several surveys, surgical residents are concerned about the negative impacts on patient continuity and quality of care. Otherwise, objective studies have demonstrated that the quality of care (mortality and morbidity rates) of surgical patients rather did not change following the implementation of the ACGME work-hour reform. Certainly, particularly the patient-resident relationship and previous patient focused attitude in treatment may suffer under the new regulation. Whether these changes also have an impact on patient satisfaction has yet to be determined. Surveys among patients are missing to date.

      Strategies to comply with the ACGME work-hour regulation

      To comply with the guidelines of the work-hour regulation, residency programs have to reduce or distribute the work-load that would have been completed by residents. Several benefits were reported after the incorporation of physician extenders (nurse practitioners or physician assistants) into the surgical service [4345]. Studies published following the implementation of the ACGME work-hour reform support prior experience [4652]. These showed a significant decrease of work-hours, workload, and even increased resident time in the operating room due to reduction of noneducative and nonclinical tasks after physician extenders were employed [46, 47]. Moreover, residents were satisfied with this assistance and believed that it decreased stress levels and helped to improve morale [47, 51]. These results demonstrate that physician extenders could be successfully integrate into surgical service and effectively improved resident work outlook [46, 47, 49, 51]. According to the studies, hiring of physician extenders was the most commonly used strategy to comply with ACGME work-hour reform [48, 50]. To maintain the continuity of patient care, authors introduced and evaluated a night-float system, which appears to reduce resident fatigue, increase sleep efficiency, and maintain quality and continuity of patient care as judged by patients and nurse [34, 50].

      Conclusion

      Our review appears to support the following main findings: The new work-hour regulation improves the quality of life and work-related satisfaction especially in junior residents. In contrast, senior residents were less satisfied with the new reform. The effects on surgical education remain unclear due to inconsistency in studies, problems in assessment of the quality of the education and the quality of the surgeon's performance. Also, there appears to be no evidence whether the reduction of work-hours and the expected decrease of fatigue increased patient safety. Moreover, objective studies demonstrate no changes in mortality and morbidity following the implementation, although, residents perceptions regarding the quality of patient care were mostly negative. Finally, we observed a lack of patient surveys analysing patient satisfaction, quality and changes of care. This data could contribute to the recents debate. Moreover, further studies are necessary to analyse the effects on scientific research in teaching hospitals, to evaluate the changes of medical error and complication, and to assess the development of costs.

      Declarations

      Authors’ Affiliations

      (1)
      Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

      References

      1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. 2008, [http://​www.​acgme.​org/​acWebsite/​dutyHours/​dh_​index.​asp]
      2. Samkoff JS, Jacques CH: A review of studies concerning effects of sleep deprivation and fatigue on residents' performance. Acad Med. 1991, 66 (11): 687-693. 10.1097/00001888-199111000-00013.View ArticlePubMed
      3. Veasey S, Rosen R, Barzansky B, Rosen I, Owens J: Sleep loss and fatigue in residency training: a reappraisal. JAMA. 2002, 288 (9): 1116-1124. 10.1001/jama.288.9.1116.View ArticlePubMed
      4. Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J: Laparoscopic performance after one night on call in a surgical department: prospective study. BMJ. 2001, 323 (7323): 1222-1223. 10.1136/bmj.323.7323.1222.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
      5. Gaba DM, Howard SK: Patient safety: fatigue among clinicians and the safety of patients. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347 (16): 1249-1255. 10.1056/NEJMsa020846.View ArticlePubMed
      6. Eastridge BJ, Hamilton EC, O'Keefe GE, Rege RV, Valentine RJ, Jones DJ, Tesfay S, Thal ER: Effect of sleep deprivation on the performance of simulated laparoscopic surgical skill. Am J Surg. 2003, 186 (2): 169-174. 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00183-1.View ArticlePubMed
      7. Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, Bass EB, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Tielsch JM, Cameron JL: Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 1998, 228 (3): 429-438. 10.1097/00000658-199809000-00016.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
      8. Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Tielsch JM, Powe NR, Gordon TA, Udelsman R: The importance of surgeon experience for clinical and economic outcomes from thyroidectomy. Ann Surg. 1998, 228 (3): 320-330. 10.1097/00000658-199809000-00005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
      9. Hammond JW, Queale WS, Kim TK, McFarland EG: Surgeon experience and clinical and economic outcomes for shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003, 85-A (12): 2318-2324.PubMed
      10. Nguyen NT, Rivers R, Wolfe BM: Factors associated with operative outcomes in laparoscopic gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg. 2003, 197 (4): 548-555. 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00648-3.View ArticlePubMed
      11. New York Health Code (10 NYCRR 405.4), New York:Department of Health. 1989
      12. Barden CB, Specht MC, McCarter MD, Daly JM, Fahey TJ: Effects of limited work hours on surgical training. J Am Coll Surg. 2002, 195 (4): 531-538. 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01242-5.View ArticlePubMed
      13. Whang EE, Perez A, Ito H, Mello MM, Ashley SW, Zinner MJ: Work hours reform: perceptions and desires of contemporary surgical residents. J Am Coll Surg. 2003, 197 (4): 624-630. 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00602-1.View ArticlePubMed
      14. Basu CB, Chen LM, Hollier LH, Shenaq SM: The effect of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Duty Hours Policy on plastic surgery resident education and patient care: an outcomes study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004, 114 (7): 1878-1886. 10.1097/01.PRS.0000142768.07468.64.View ArticlePubMed
      15. Chung R, Ahmed N, Chen P: Meeting the 80-hour work week requirement: what did we cut?. Curr Surg. 2004, 61 (6): 609-611. 10.1016/j.cursur.2004.07.010.View ArticlePubMed
      16. Kort KC, Pavone LA, Jensen E, Haque E, Newman N, Kittur D: Resident perceptions of the impact of work-hour restrictions on health care delivery and surgical education: time for transformational change. Surgery. 2004, 136 (4): 861-871. 10.1016/j.surg.2004.07.005.View ArticlePubMed
      17. Stamp T, Termuhlen P, Miller S, Nolan D, Hutzel P, Gilchrist J, Johnson RM: Before and after resident work hour limitations: an objective assessment of the well-being of surgical residents. Curr Surg. 2005, 62 (1): 117-121. 10.1016/j.cursur.2004.09.013.View ArticlePubMed
      18. Hutter MM, Kellogg KC, Ferguson CM, Abbott WM, Warshaw AL: The impact of the 80-hour resident workweek on surgical residents and attending surgeons. Ann Surg. 2006, 243 (6): 864-871. 10.1097/01.sla.0000220042.48310.66.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
      19. Immerman I, Kubiak EN, Zuckerman JD: Resident work-hour rules: a survey of residents' and program directors' opinions and attitudes. Am J Orthop. 2007, 36 (12): E172-E179.PubMed
      20. Schneider JR, Coyle JJ, Ryan ER, Bell RH, DaRosa DA: Implementation and evaluation of a new surgical residency model. J Am Coll Surg. 2007, 205 (3): 393-404. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.05.013.View ArticlePubMed
      21. Gelfand DV, Podnos YD, Carmichael JC, Saltzman DJ, Wilson SE, Williams RA: Effect of the 80-hour workweek on resident burnout. Arch Surg. 2004, 139 (9): 933-938. 10.1001/archsurg.139.9.933.View ArticlePubMed
      22. Spencer AU, Teitelbaum DH: Impact of work-hour restrictions on residents' operative volume on a subspecialty surgical service. J Am Coll Surg. 2005, 200 (5): 670-676. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.01.008.View ArticlePubMed
      23. Mendoza KA, Britt LD: Resident operative experience during the transition to work-hour reform. Arch Surg. 2005, 140 (2): 137-145. 10.1001/archsurg.140.2.137.View ArticlePubMed
      24. Ferguson CM, Kellogg KC, Hutter MM, Warshaw AL: Effect of work-hour reforms on operative case volume of surgical residents. Curr Surg. 2005, 62 (5): 535-538. 10.1016/j.cursur.2005.04.001.View ArticlePubMed
      25. Malangoni MA, Como JJ, Mancuso C, Yowler CJ: Life after 80 hours: the impact of resident work hours mandates on trauma and emergency experience and work effort for senior residents and faculty. J Trauma. 2005, 58 (4): 758-761. 10.1097/01.TA.0000159248.66521.7E.View ArticlePubMed
      26. Pappas AJ, Teague DC: The impact of the accreditation council for graduate medical education work-hour regulations on the surgical experience of orthopaedic surgery residents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007, 89 (4): 904-909. 10.2106/JBJS.F.01083.View ArticlePubMed
      27. Jarman BT, Miller MR, Brown RS, Armen SB, Bozaan AG, Ho GT, Hartranft TH: The 80-hour work week: will we have less-experienced graduating surgeons?. Curr Surg. 2004, 61 (6): 612-615. 10.1016/j.cursur.2004.06.016.View ArticlePubMed
      28. Myers JS, Bellini LM, Morris JB, Graham D, Katz J, Potts JR, Weiner C, Volpp KG: Internal medicine and general surgery residents' attitudes about the ACGME duty hours regulations: a multicenter study. Acad Med. 2006, 81 (12): 1052-1058. 10.1097/01.ACM.0000246687.03462.59.View ArticlePubMed
      29. Cohen-Gadol AA, Piepgras DG, Krishnamurthy S, Fessler RD: Resident duty hours reform: results of a national survey of the program directors and residents in neurosurgery training programs. Neurosurgery. 2005, 56 (2): 398-403. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000147999.64356.57.View ArticlePubMed
      30. Peabody T: The effect of work hour restrictions on the education of orthopaedic surgery residents. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006, 449: 128-133.PubMed
      31. Haddad M, Zelikovski A, Gutman H, Haddad E, Reiss R: Assessment of surgical residents' competence based on postoperative complications. Int Surg. 1987, 72 (4): 230-232.PubMed
      32. Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC: The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns?. Health Serv Res. 1987, 22 (2): 157-182.PubMed CentralPubMed
      33. Shaked A, Calderom I, Durst A: Safety of surgical procedures performed by residents. Arch Surg. 1991, 126 (5): 559-560.View ArticlePubMed
      34. Goldstein MJ, Kim E, Widmann WD, Hardy MA: A 360 degrees evaluation of a night-float system for general surgery: a response to mandated work-hours reduction. Curr Surg. 2004, 61 (5): 445-451. 10.1016/j.cursur.2004.03.013.View ArticlePubMed
      35. Bollschweiler E, Krings A, Fuchs KH, Pistorius G, Bein T, Otto U, Muhl E, Backes-Gellner U, Holscher AH: Alternative shift models and the quality of patient care. An empirical study in surgical intensive care units. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001, 386 (2): 104-109. 10.1007/s004230000188.View ArticlePubMed
      36. Petersen LA, Brennan TA, O'Neil AC, Cook EF, Lee TH: Does housestaff discontinuity of care increase the risk for preventable adverse events?. Ann Intern Med. 1994, 121 (11): 12-1.View Article
      37. Shetty KD, Bhattacharya J: Changes in hospital mortality associated with residency work-hour regulations. Ann Intern Med. 2007, 147 (2): 73-80.View ArticlePubMed
      38. Volpp KG, Rosen AK, Rosenbaum PR, Romano PS, Even-Shoshan O, Wang Y, Bellini L, Behringer T, Silber JH: Mortality among hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries in the first 2 years following ACGME resident duty hour reform. JAMA. 2007, 298 (9): 975-983. 10.1001/jama.298.9.975.View ArticlePubMed
      39. Morrison CA, Wyatt MM, Carrick MM: Impact of the 80-Hour Work Week on Mortality and Morbidity in Trauma Patients: An Analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Surg Res. 2008
      40. Rogers F, Shackford S, Daniel S, Crookes B, Sartorelli K, Charash W, Igneri P: Workload redistribution: a new approach to the 80-hour workweek. J Trauma. 2005, 58 (5): 911-914. 10.1097/01.TA.0000162140.00181.04.View ArticlePubMed
      41. Landrigan CP, Rothschild JM, Cronin JW, Kaushal R, Burdick E, Katz JT, Lilly CM, Stone PH, Lockley SW, Bates DW, Czeisler CA: Effect of reducing interns' work hours on serious medical errors in intensive care units. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351 (18): 1838-1848. 10.1056/NEJMoa041406.View ArticlePubMed
      42. Lockley SW, Cronin JW, Evans EE, Cade BE, Lee CJ, Landrigan CP, Rothschild JM, Katz JT, Lilly CM, Stone PH, Aeschbach D, Czeisler CA: Effect of reducing interns' weekly work hours on sleep and attentional failures. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351 (18): 1829-1837. 10.1056/NEJMoa041404.View ArticlePubMed
      43. Spisso J, O'Callaghan C, McKennan M, Holcroft JW: Improved quality of care and reduction of housestaff workload using trauma nurse practitioners. J Trauma. 1990, 30 (6): 660-663. 10.1097/00005373-199006000-00001.View ArticlePubMed
      44. Nemes J, Barnaby K, Shamberger RC: Experience with a nurse practitioner program in the surgical department of a children's hospital. J Pediatr Surg. 1992, 27 (8): 1038-1040. 10.1016/0022-3468(92)90554-K.View ArticlePubMed
      45. Hassett JM, Nawotniak R, Cummiskey D, Berger R, Posner A, Seibel R, Hoover E: Maintaining outcomes in a surgical residency while complying with resident working hour regulations. Surgery. 2002, 132 (4): 635-639. 10.1067/msy.2002.127542.View ArticlePubMed
      46. Podnos YD, Williams RA, Jimenez JC, Stemmer EA, Gordon IL, Wilson SE: Reducing the noneducational and nonclinical workload of the surgical resident; defining the role of the health technician. Curr Surg. 2003, 60 (5): 529-532. 10.1016/S0149-7944(03)00004-7.View ArticlePubMed
      47. Victorino GP, Organ CH: Physician assistant influence on surgery residents. Arch Surg. 2003, 138 (9): 971-975. 10.1001/archsurg.138.9.971.View ArticlePubMed
      48. Chandra RK: The resident 80-hour work week: how has it affected surgical specialties?. Laryngoscope. 2004, 114 (8): 1394-1398. 10.1097/00005537-200408000-00014.View ArticlePubMed
      49. Christmas AB, Reynolds J, Hodges S, Franklin GA, Miller FB, Richardson JD, Rodriguez JL: Physician extenders impact trauma systems. J Trauma. 2005, 58 (5): 917-920. 10.1097/01.TA.0000162736.06947.E3.View ArticlePubMed
      50. Gordon CR, Axelrad A, Alexander JB, Dellinger RP, Ross SE: Care of critically ill surgical patients using the 80-hour Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education work-week guidelines: a survey of current strategies. Am Surg. 2006, 72 (6): 497-499.PubMed
      51. Lundberg S, Wali S, Thomas P, Cope D: Attaining resident duty hours compliance: the acute care nurse practitioners program at Olive View-UCLA Medical Center. Acad Med. 2006, 81 (12): 1021-1025. 10.1097/01.ACM.0000246677.36103.ad.View ArticlePubMed
      52. Haan JM, Dutton RP, Willis M, Leone S, Kramer ME, Scalea TM: Discharge rounds in the 80-hour workweek: importance of the trauma nurse practitioner. J Trauma. 2007, 63 (2): 339-343. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3180d0a8a6.View ArticlePubMed

      Copyright

      © Pape and Pfeifer; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

      This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.