Fatal outcome after insufficient spine fixation for pyogenic thoracic spondylodiscitis: an imperative for 360° fusion of the infected spine
© Flierl et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 03 January 2009
Accepted: 25 February 2009
Published: 25 February 2009
Pyogenic spondylodiscitis represents a potentially life-threatening condition. Due to the low incidence, evidence-based surgical recommendations in the literature are equivocal, and the treatment modalities remain controversial.
A 59 year-old patient presented with a history of thoracic spondylodiscitis resistant to antibiotic treatment for 6 weeks, progressive severe back pain, and a new onset of bilateral lower extremity weakness. Clinically, the patient showed a deteriorating spastic paraparesis of her lower extremities. An emergent MRI revealed a kyphotic wedge compression fracture at T7/T8 with significant spinal cord compression, paravertebral and epidural abscess, and signs of myelopathy. The patient underwent surgical debridement with stabilization of the anterior column from T6–T9 using an expandable titanium cage, autologous bone graft, and an anterolateral locking plate. The patient recovered well under adjunctive antibiotic treatment. She presented again to the emergency department 6 months later, secondary to a repeat fall, with acute paraplegia of the lower extremities and radiographic evidence of failure of fixation of the anterior T-spine. She underwent antero-posterior revision fixation with hardware removal, correction of kyphotic malunion, evacuation of a recurrent epidural abscess, decompression of the spinal canal, and 360° fusion from T2–T11. Despite the successful salvage procedure, the patient deteriorated in the postoperative phase, when she developed multiple complications including pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, bacterial meningitis, abdominal compartment syndrome, followed by septic shock with multiple organ failure and a lethal outcome within two weeks after revision surgery.
This catastrophic example of a lethal outcome secondary to failure of anterior column fixation for pyogenic thoracic spondylodiscitis underlines the notion that surgical strategies for the infected spine must be aimed at achieving absolute stability by a 360° fusion. This aggressive – albeit controversial – concept allows for an adequate infection control by adjunctive antibiotics and reduces the imminent risk of a secondary loss of fixation due to compromises in initial fixation techniques.
Spinal infections are rare and the annual incidence of spondylodiscitis is estimated to be about 2.4/100,000 person-years . However, spondylodiscitis is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates . While only 0.2–4% of all spinal procedures result in postoperative discitis , spinal infections after surgery can become a life-threatening event to the patient . In its early stages, spondylodiscitis usually responds favorably to antibiotic therapy . If non-surgical treatment for more than 6 weeks fails, or if patients deteriorate secondary to paraspinal abscesses, sepsis, spinal deformities due to destruction of the endplates or progressive neurological impairment, operative treatment must be considered . Most recommendations for surgical treatment of spinal infections are largely based on retrospective case series or case reports and remain inconsistent [7, 8]. In particular, the use of metal implants at a septic focus has traditionally been rigorously avoided since pathogen adhesion to the implants present a matter of concern . More recently, this notion has been challenged by reports in the literature which presented favorable outcomes using titanium cages in the surgical management of spondylodiscitis [10–12]. Whether this paradox of a distinct management strategy for osteomyelitis in the spine as opposed to infected peripheral long bones, e.g. the tibia, is related to the solid immunological properties of the highly vascularized spine and adequate soft tissue coverage, remains a topic of speculation . Despite these recent promising reports on the successful aggressive debridement and spinal stabilization procedures [10–14], the adequate surgical treatment modalities for the infected spine has not been unequivocally defined until present.
In the present paper, we present the catastrophic example of a 59-year old patient with inadequate initial fixation for thoracic spondylodiscitis, with a fatal outcome two weeks after revision surgery with 360° thoracic spine fusion.
The primary goal of surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis is the radical debridement of any infectious and necrotic tissues . However, extensive debridement of the anterior column of the spine, which is known to be predominantly involved in vertebral osteomyelitis , often creates large defects that adversely affect spinal stability. While structural bone autografts represent the "gold standard" for reconstruction of these anterior column defects , harvest of large autografts is limited and is associated with considerable donor site morbidity . Titanium mesh cages have been demonstrated to be a viable alternative for bridging large anterior defects [10–12], despite the traditional concept that metal implants are not to be implanted in sites of active infections.
Another "key" component of successful surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis is restoration of spinal anatomy and stability. Yet, there is currently a lack of consensus in the pertinent literature regarding the appropriate fixation modalities. The question of whether isolated anterior, isolated posterior, or combined antero-posterior fixation strategies represent the adequate therapy of choice remain a topic of debate. While some authors consider isolated anterior stabilization for single-level or larger defects an adequate treatment strategy , other groups advocate the exclusive posterior fixation with percutaneous drainage of anterior abscesses . A recent retrospective study analyzed the outcome in 24 consecutive patients treated by spinal fusion for pyogenic spondylodiscitis, either by "stand-alone" anterior strut grafting, or by combined anterior interbody fusion with posterior instrumented fixation . No recurrences of infection was described in either group, However, the authors found an increased incidence of complications related to the exclusive anterior bone graft fixation, compared to the antero-posterior, 360° fixation group . In a similar study published in the German literature , the authors advocated a single-stage procedure of debridement and instrumented fusion for pyogenic spondylodiscitis, either by exclusive anterior or combined antero-posterior 360° fusion. No recurrence of infection was noted in either group during a follow-up period of 18 months . The group of Christoph Heyde from Berlin has recently provided convincing evidence on safety and efficacy of the "radical" concept of surgical debridement with antero-posterior 360° fusion for pyogenic spondylodiscitis, based on multiple publications in the peer-reviewed literature [10, 11, 13]. The question of whether such severely ill patients are best treated by an aggressive "all-in-one" 360° procedure, or whether it is safer to postpone the individual procedures in terms of a staged concept of posterior and anterior spinal fusion, remains controversial [8, 10–12, 14].
Patients with spondylodiscitis frequently present with multiple co-morbidities [20, 21] In the present case, our 59-year old patient had a long-standing history of hepatitis C, arterial hypertension, and intravenous drug abuse. The latter has been previously identified as an independent risk factor for spinal infection . Given the significant co-morbidities, it remains a matter of speculation whether the patient presented in this case report may have survived the severe spine infection (Figure 1) by an initial, aggressive all-in-one 360° fusion, would have likely decreased the risk of a secondary loss of fixation (Figure 3) attributed to a reduced spinal stability by exclusive fixation of the anterior column (Figure 2). Due to the patient's i.v. drug addiction, repeated falls may have been anticipated, and the revision surgery secondary to loss of fixation, which initiated the cascade of subsequent postoperative complications, leading to the ultimate lethal outcome, may have been avoided. Collectively, the root causes for failed index surgery in this case are likely multiple. Persistent chronic systemic infection and acute local infection, arguably related to continued i.v. drug abuse, local instability and immunocompromise from chronic hepatitis and malnutrition-induced osteoporosis, as well as inadequate fixation owing in part to short segment, stand-alone anterior fusion may have synergistically contributed to the catastrophic outcome described in this report.
The dismal outcome of this 59-year patient, secondary to revision fixation for a failed anterior fusion for pyogenic thoracic spondylodiscitis, implies that an inadequate initial treatment modality may lead to a delayed cascade of complicating events with the potential for a lethal outcome. We recommend the more aggressive approach – which is supported by the recent peer-reviewed literature – of a radical surgical debridement associated with a 360° antero-posterior instrumented fusion, for multi-morbid patients suffering from pyogenic spondylodiscitis.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's relatives for publication of this case report.
- Grammatico L, Besnier JM: Infectious spondylodiscitis. Rev Prat. 2007, 57 (9): 970-978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hadjipavlou AG, Mader JT, Necessary JT, Muffoletto AJ: Hematogenous pyogenic spinal infections and their surgical management. Spine. 2000, 25 (13): 1668-1679. 10.1097/00007632-200007010-00010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Silber JS, Anderson DG, Vaccaro AR, Anderson PA, McCormick P: Management of postprocedural discitis. Spine J. 2002, 2 (4): 279-287. 10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00203-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Danner RL, Hartman BJ: Update on spinal epidural abscess: 35 cases and review of the literature. Rev Infect Dis. 1987, 9 (2): 265-274.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carragee EJ: Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997, 79 (6): 874-880.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schinkel C, Gottwald M, Andress HJ: Surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2003, 4 (4): 387-391. 10.1089/109629603322761445.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ha KY, Shin JH, Kim KW, Na KH: The fate of anterior autogenous bone graft after anterior radical surgery with or without posterior instrumentation in the treatment of pyogenic lumbar spondylodiscitis. Spine. 2007, 32 (17): 1856-1864. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318108b804.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pee YH, Park JD, Choi YG, Lee SH: Anterior debridement and fusion followed by posterior pedicle screw fixation in pyogenic spondylodiscitis: autologous iliac bone strut versus cage. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008, 8 (5): 405-412. 10.3171/SPI/2008/8/5/405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ha KY, Chung YG, Ryoo SJ: Adherence and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis on various spinal implants. Spine. 2005, 30 (1): 38-43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robinson Y, Tschoeke SK, Finke T, Kayser R, Ertel W, Heyde CE: Successful treatment of spondylodiscitis using titanium cages: a 3-year follow-up of 22 consecutive patients. Acta Orthop. 2008, 79 (5): 660-664. 10.1080/17453670810016687.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robinson Y, Tschoeke SK, Kayser R, Boehm H, Heyde CE: Reconstruction of large defects in vertebral osteomyelitis with expandable titanium cages. Int Orthop. 2008,Google Scholar
- Ruf M, Stoltze D, Merk HR, Ames M, Harms J: Treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis by radical debridement and stabilization using titanium mesh cages. Spine. 2007, 32 (9): E275-280. 10.1097/01.brs.0000261034.83395.7f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heyde CE, Boehm H, El Saghir H, Tschoke SK, Kayser R: Surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis in the cervical spine: a minimum 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2006, 15 (9): 1380-1387. 10.1007/s00586-006-0191-z.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robinson Y, Reinke M, Kayser R, Ertel W, Heyde CE: Postoperative multisegmental lumbar discitis treated by staged ventrodorsoventral intervention. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2007, 8 (5): 529-534.Google Scholar
- Calderone RR, Larsen JM: Overview and classification of spinal infections. Orthop Clin North Am. 1996, 27 (1): 1-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS: Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity. A statistical evaluation. Spine. 1995, 20 (9): 1055-1060. 10.1097/00007632-199505000-00012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klockner C, Valencia R: Sagittal alignment after anterior debridement and fusion with or without additional posterior instrumentation in the treatment of pyogenic and tuberculous spondylodiscitis. Spine. 2003, 28 (10): 1036-1042. 10.1097/00007632-200305150-00016.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frangen TM, Kalicke T, Gottwald M, Andereya S, Andress HJ, Russe OJ, Muller EJ, Muhr G, Schinkel C: [Surgical management of spondylodiscitis. An analysis of 78 cases]. Unfallchirurg. 2006, 109 (9): 743-753. 10.1007/s00113-006-1084-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suess O, Weise L, Brock M, Kombos T: Debridement and spinal instrumentation as a single-stage procedure in bacterial spondylitis/spondylodiscitis. Zentralbl Neurochir. 2007, 68 (3): 123-132. 10.1055/s-2007-984461.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reihsaus E, Waldbaur H, Seeling W: Spinal epidural abscess: a meta-analysis of 915 patients. Neurosurg Rev. 2000, 23 (4): 175-204. 10.1007/PL00011954.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turgut M: Complete recovery of acute paraplegia due to pyogenic thoracic spondylodiscitis with an epidural abscess. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008, 150 (4): 381-386. 10.1007/s00701-007-1485-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.