Table 2 Differences between operative and non-operative disciplines in evaluation of examiner trainings, concerning the main effects of the training
Professional discipline | N | Mean | SD | p-value | T | df | Mean difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The training contributed to conscious handling of both the strengths and weaknesses of oral examinations | Operative | 28 | 1.9 | 1.1 | ||||
Non-operative | 35 | 2.6 | 1.5 | 0.04 | -2.1 | 61 | -0.7 | |
The training led to profound knowledge of the factors influencing the reliability of oral exams | Operative | 28 | 1.9 | 0.9 | ||||
Non-operative | 34 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 0.01 | -2.7 | 57 | -0.8 | |
The training led to profound knowledge of the factors influencing the validity of oral exams | Operativ | 28 | 1.9 | 1.0 | ||||
Non-operative | 35 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 0.03 | -2.2 | 61 | -0.7 | |