Skip to main content

Table 3 EF Usage Considerations by Hospital Type, Based on a Survey of 243 OTA Members

From: Use of reprocessed external fixators in orthopaedic surgery: a survey of 243 orthopaedic trauma surgeons

EF Usage

Hospital Type, No. (%)

Hospital Affiliation, No. (%)

For-Profit (nā€‰=ā€‰39)

Nonprofit (nā€‰=ā€‰204)

P

University (nā€‰=ā€‰111)

Community (nā€‰=ā€‰109)

Public (nā€‰=ā€‰23)

P

Currently use reprocess EFs

ā€ƒYes

6 (15)

84 (41)

0.004

54 (49)

30 (28)

13 (57)

0.001

ā€ƒNo

33 (85)

120 (59)

57 (51)

79 (72)

10 (43)

Believe that EF reprocessing is cost-effective

ā€ƒYes

31 (79)

180 (88)

0.320

92 (83)

92 (84)

11 (48)

<ā€‰0.001

ā€ƒNo

2 (5.1)

5 (2.5)

5 (4.5)

4 (3.7)

1 (4.4)

ā€ƒUndecided

6 (15)

19 (9.3)

14 (13)

13 (12)

11 (48)

Considering use of reprocessed EFs

ā€ƒYes

18 (55)

77 (64)

0.126

46 (81)

56 (71)

3 (30)

<ā€‰0.001

ā€ƒNo

12 (36)

24 (20)

5 (8.8)

15 (19)

1 (10)

ā€ƒUndecided

3 (9.1)

19 (16)

6 (11)

8 (10)

7 (70)

  1. EF external fixator, OTA Orthopaedic Trauma Association