Skip to main content

Table 4 Perceptions of Reprocessed EFs, Based on Survey of 243 Orthopaedic Trauma Association Members

From: Use of reprocessed external fixators in orthopaedic surgery: a survey of 243 orthopaedic trauma surgeons

Perception

No. (%)

Do you believe that EF reprocessing can be cost-effective?

ā€ƒYes

211 (87)

ā€ƒNo

8 (3.2)

ā€ƒUndecided

24 (10)

Do you believe that EF reprocessing can be beneficial to the hospital in generating revenue?

ā€ƒYes

156 (64)

ā€ƒNot beneficial to hospital or patient savings

41 (17)

ā€ƒNo, only patient savings

17 (7.0)

ā€ƒUnsure

29 (12)

Most important obstacle to widespread implementation of reprocessing

ā€ƒVendor coordination/logistics of reprocessing

61 (25)

ā€ƒLitigation concerns

49 (20)

ā€ƒConcerns with instrumentation failure and limitations

41 (17)

ā€ƒGap in knowledge about process

39 (16)

ā€ƒDoubts about actual cost savings

32 (13)

ā€ƒEthical concerns

17 (7.0)

ā€ƒHospital policy/billing process

2 (0.82)

ā€ƒNo concern

2 (0.82)

  1. EF external fixator