Skip to main content

Table 4 Overall kappa coefficient by diagnostic method and classification among residents (Group 2)

From: Inter-observer reliability of alternative diagnostic methods for proximal humerus fractures: a comparison between attending surgeons and orthopedic residents in training

 

RX

Tomography

3D models

Augmented Reality/Holography

Kappa

p

Kappa

p

Kappa

p

Kappa

p

AO

0.369

<0.001

0.210

<0.001

0.455

<0.001

0.263

<0.001

 Aa

0.470

< 0.001

0.276

< 0.001

0.613

< 0.001

0.366

< 0.001

 Ba

0.206

< 0.001

0.021

0.098

0.139

< 0.001

0.029

0,037

 Ca

0.438

< 0.001

0.335

< 0.001

0.541

< 0.001

0.341

< 0.001

Neer

0.268

<0.001

0.158

<0.001

0.397

<0.001

0.251

<0.001

 1 part

0.013

0.216

0.003

0.419

0.059

< 0.001

−0.005

0.618

 2 parts

0.460

< 0.001

0.230

< 0.001

0.647

< 0.001

0.432

< 0.001

 3 parts

0.066

< 0.001

0.015

0.180

0.174

< 0.001

0.076

< 0.001

 4 parts

0.312

< 0.001

0.257

< 0.001

0.379

< 0.001

0.250

< 0.001

  1. AO Arbeit Gemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen classification, Neer Charles Neer classification
  2. a Groups A, B and C adopted by the AO / ASIF, with correspondence to 2, 3 and 4 parts respectively (Kellam and Meinberg, 2018) [8]
  3. N = 30 resident physicians