Skip to main content

Table 6 Summary of kappa coefficients for agreement between AO / ASIF and Neer classification by time of experience, according to diagnostic method among residents (Group 2)

From: Inter-observer reliability of alternative diagnostic methods for proximal humerus fractures: a comparison between attending surgeons and orthopedic residents in training

Diagnostic Method

Means

Standard Deviation

Minimum

Maximum

1st. Quartile

Median

3rd. Quartile

N

p

X-ray

0.619

0.337

-0.033

1.000

0.321

0.726

1.000

30

0.689

 First year

0.636

0.419

−0.033

1.000

0.218

0.824

1.000

9

 

 Second year

0.544

0.321

0.036

1.000

0.313

0.495

0.868

10

 

 Third year

0.672

0.295

0.224

1.000

0.321

0.813

0.833

11

 

Tomography

0.558

0.376

-0.125

1.000

0.211

0.571

1.000

30

0.535

 First year

0.608

0.396

−0.050

1.000

0.220

0.673

1.000

9

 

 Second year

0.446

0.380

−0.125

1.000

0.156

0.363

0.827

10

 

 Third year

0.618

0.369

0.045

1.000

0.237

0.633

1.000

11

 

3D models

0.658

0.301

-0.050

1.000

0.437

0.736

0.868

30

0.861

 First year

0.613

0.361

0.060

1.000

0.227

0.813

0.912

9

 

 Second year

0.690

0.301

−0.050

1.000

0.604

0.736

0.868

10

 

 Third year

0.666

0.273

0.321

1.000

0.400

0.640

1.000

11

 

Holography

0.671

0.295

0.087

1.000

0.490

0.675

1.000

30

0.836

 First year

0.695

0.369

0.087

1.000

0.333

0.833

1.000

9

 

 Second year

0.624

0.288

0.167

1.000

0.408

0.628

0.873

10

 

 Third year

0.695

0.255

0.237

1.000

0.500

0.660

1.000

11

 
  1. p values from ANOVA