Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Outcome studies of operative treatment of displaced acetabular fractures listed in order of number of cases surgically treated with follow-up, year of publication, country of origin, number of cases, average follow-up period (F/U yrs), G-E results OR survivorship (% survival at 10 or 20 yrs), and negative prognostic factors

From: Outcomes after surgical treatment of acetabular fractures: a review

Author Year Country Cases (F/U yrs) G-E Result/Survivorship Negative prognostic factors
Tannast/Matta et al [3] 2012 USA 816 (2–20) 85% (10YR) 79% (20 YRS) FHI, PW, AGE, DISP, MI
Letournel/Judet [4] 1993 FRANCE 492 (1–33) 80% PC/PW, AW, PR
Mears et al [48] 2003 USA 424 (9.3) 89% PR, FN, DEL > 11, AF, SI, FHI, OB, AW, AGE
Matta [20] 1996 USA 255 (6) 76% AGE, FHI, SI, TT/PW
Clarke-Jenssen et al [49] 2017 NORWAY 253 (12) 86% (10YRS) FHI, SI
Madhu et al [53] 2006 UK 237 (2.9) 76% DEL > 15 (EF), DEL > 10(AF)
Murphy et ala [65] 2003 IRELAND 180 (6.3) 78% AF, AGE, PR > 3, HO, LC
Rommens et al [66] 1997 BELGIUM 175 (2) 76% TT/PW
Mayo [67] 1994 USA 163 (3.7) 75%
Briffa et al [26] 2011 UK 161 (11.3) 72% AGE, DEL > 15, PR, PC/TT, FHI
Pennal et ala [51] 1980 CANADA 103 (7.25) FX, WB, PR, AGE, PELVIS
Wright et al [56] 1994 USA 87 (3.6) 45% DL, HO, AVN, AGE, PR, EXP
Zha et alb [23] 2013 CHINA 86 (3.2) 84% CPWF, FHI, PR
Fica et al [68] 1998 CHILE 84 (5.5) 67% TT, PR, AGE, AVN
Zhi et al [69] 2011 CHINA 82 (2.8) 71% FX, AGE, LE FX, PR, DEL, DL
Rommens et al [50] 2011 GERMANY 77 (3.7) 70% CPWF, SI, IAF
Almedia et al [70] 2011 BRAZIL 76 (4.9) 81% PR, LOR, DI
Deo et al [71] 2001 UK 74 (2.6) 74% FH, PR, NERVE/DL
Chen et al [72] 2000 TAIWAN 73 (7.5) 74% PR
Uchida et al [73] 2013 JAPAN 71 (8.6) 90% PR, AVN, SI
Ragnarsson et al [74] 1992 SWEDEN 55 (15) 60% PR
Heeg et al [75] 1990 HOLLAND 54 (9.6) 61% PR, HO
Kebaish et al [54] 1991 CANADA 54 (4.7) 86% EXP, PR
Ruesch/Mast et al [76] 1994 USA 53 (1+) 81% N/A
De Ridder et al [55] 1994 HOLLAND 51 (3) 76%
Oranksy et al [77] 1993 ITALY 50 (3.5) 76% DEL > 21, PR, EXP
Chiu et alc [33] 1996 CHINA 27 (7) 81%
Brueton [78] 1993 UK 26 (2.2) 61% PR, DEL > 17
  1. G-E results good to excellent results, FHI femoral head injury, CPWF comminuted posterior wall fragment, AW anterior wall fracture, PR poor reduction, SI subchondral impaction, IAF intra-articular fragment, FX fracture pattern, WB damage to wb dome, PELVIS injury to the pelvic ring, AGE patient age > 40, FN ipsilateral fem. neck fx, AF associated fx, EF elementary fx, EXP surgeon experience, DEL delay to surgery (i.e. delay > 15 days), TT t-shaped acetabular fracture, PW posterior wall acetabular fracture, DI deep infection, LOR loss of reduction, NERVE nerve injury, DL dislocation, LE FX lower extremity fracture, OB obesity, HO heterotopic ossification, LC local complications
  2. a This study utilized different surgical approaches
  3. b Cohort of elderly patients
  4. c Cohort of operatively treated posterior wall fractures