Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of Participating Level I Trauma Centers and Their Pelvic Fracture Management Guidelines

From: A descriptive survey on the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for pelvic fractures at US level I trauma centers

Survey Question

Responses

% (n)

n

Does your hospital have a guideline for pelvic fracture management?

Yes

No

73% (29)

28% (11)

40

In what year was the current guideline for pelvic fracture management implemented? If unknown, please leave blank.

2005

5% (1)

19

2006

5% (1)

2011

5% (1)

2013

16% (3)

2014

5% (1)

2015

21% (4)

2016

37% (7)

2017

5% (1)

Is your hospital’s guideline for pelvic fracture management based on a published guideline?

Yes

79% (23)

29

No

21% (6)

What published guideline is your hospital following?

WTA

29% (6)

21

EAST

43% (9)

TQIP

14% (3)

WSES

0

ATLS

10% (2)

Other (please specify): fill in the blank.a

5% (1)

How long has your trauma center been an ACS-verified Level I trauma center?

≤ 1 year

5% (2)

40

>  1 year to 2 years

15% (6)

>  2 years to 5 years

18% (7)

>  5 to 10 years

5% (2)

>  10 years

58% (23)

How many trauma admissions did you have in 2017?

High volume (>  1500)

90% (36)

40

Low volume (≤ 1500)

10% (4)

  1. WTA Western Trauma Association, EAST Eastern Trauma Association, TQIP Trauma Quality Improvement Project, WSES World Society of Emergency Surgeons, ATLS Advanced Trauma Life Support, a Participant indicated that protocol is based on the Orthopedic Trauma Association, EAST, TQIP and a literature review