Skip to main content

Table 2 Distribution (%) of treatment indications (non-surgical, osteosynthesis and arthroplasty) for residents and experts using differents diagnostics methods (X-rays, tomography, 3D-models and holography)

From: Three-dimensional models increase the interobserver agreement for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures

 

Treatments

Total

p

Conservative (non-surgical)

Osteosynthesis

Arthroplasty

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

Total

 X-ray

42

9,3%

248

55,1%

160

35,6%

450

100,0%

0,451

  Residents

29

10,7%

147

54,4%

94

34,8%

270

100,0%

 

  Experts

13

7,2%

101

56,1%

66

36,7%

180

100,0%

 

 Tomography

79

17,6%

225

50,0%

146

32,4%

450

100,0%

0,003

  Residents

51

18,9%

148

54,8%

71

26,3%

270

100,0%

 

  Experts

28

15,6%

77

42,8%

75

41,7%

180

100,0%

 

 3D-models

43

9,6%

250

55,6%

157

34,9%

450

100,0%

0,532

   Residents

29

10,7%

150

55,6%

91

33,7%

270

100,0%

 

  Experts

14

7,8%

100

55,6%

66

36,7%

180

100,0%

 

 Holography

60

13,3%

262

58,2%

128

28,4%

450

100,0%

0,134

  Residents

42

15,6%

158

58,5%

70

25,9%

270

100,0%

 

  Experts

18

10,0%

104

57,8%

58

32,2%

180

100,0%

 
  1. p – descriptive level of the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact (a)