Skip to main content

Table 5 Characteristics of recovery factors and corrective measures among the cohort

From: Contributing factors to severe complications after liver resection: an aggregate root cause analysis in 105 consecutive patients

ALARM category Recovery factors Corrective measures
N Description (n associated cases) N Description
I. PATIENT
FACTORS
2 - Family support (10 cases)
- Proactive adaptation of intraoperative support to case complexity (6 cases)
5 - To restrict the indications of combined colorectal surgery**
- To implement a protocol for patient psychological assessment**
- To implement a protocol for patient oncogeriatric assessment**
- To implement a protocol for patient nutritional assessment**
- To implement a management protocol for obese patients
II. TASK FACTORS 6 - Proactive readmission to the ICU (5 cases)
- Proactive indication of imaging (4 cases)
- Proactive revision surgery to control complication (4 cases)
- Management of the complication by attendings (2 cases)
- Proactive indication of percutaneous drainage (1 case)
- Complication management handover (1 case)
5 - To implement a protocol for intraoperative changes in strategy
- To mention treatment strategy changes in surgical report
- To implement protocols for operating instructions of medical devices
- To implement management protocols for liver resection complications:
- percutaneous drainage
- pleural effusion
- anastomosis leaks
- To implement postoperative management protocols:
- indications of imaging**
- emergency revision surgery (management and supervision)
- criteria for hospital discharge**
- criteria for ICU discharge**
III. INDIVIDUAL (STAFF)
FACTORS
4 - Proactive call for intraoperative surgical support (6 cases)
- Proactive hemorrhage management by a resident (2 cases)
- Proactive hemorrhage management by a nurse (1 case)
- Complication management handover (1 case)
3 - To check cystic ligature after hepatic pedicle clamping**
- To check the loss of selectivity of the clamping during liver section**
- To discuss a validation for change in intraoperative strategy
IV. TEAM
FACTORS
4 - Shared decision by the surgical team (9 cases)
- Internal multidisciplinary concertation: Surgery-ICU (8 cases)
- External multidisciplinary concertation, e.g.: Thoracic surgery (3 cases)
- Proactive revision surgery to control hemorrhage (1 case)
3 - To offer insight when validation for change in intraoperative strategy
- To optimize internal communication (Surgery-ICU)**
- To optimize external communication (Outside of NIO)**
V. WORK ENVIRONMENT
FACTORS
0   4 - To adapt workload during holiday seasons**
- To optimize nurses’ night on-call scheduling
- To optimize records of medical and paramedical procedures**
- To implement a system of patient risk management
VI. ORGANIZATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT FACTORS 1 - Immediate availability of blood* (1 case) 3 - To tackle the failure of bacteriology test circuit
- To report MMR recommendations to the hospital administration
- To tackle the issue of blood shortage
Total 17 Total 23  
  1. * Near miss, **Ongoing improvement
  2. in Bold: specific to liver resection
  3. BMI body mass index, ICU Intensive Care Unit, NIO National Institute of Oncology
\