"This is an exciting time to be involved in promoting a global culture of patient safety among all healthcare providers, particularly for the next generation of physicians and surgeons. Current patient safety protocols continue to fall short of protecting our patients from suffering unintended harm. Our journal provides a forum for reporting, discussing, and designing new patient safety standards for the future."
Aims and Scope
Patient Safety in Surgery is an open access journal that publishes articles on all issues related to safety and quality of patient care in surgery and surgical subspecialties.
The journal provides a scientific platform for specialists from all surgical fields and for other healthcare professionals to report, discuss, debate, and critically review all aspects related to errors, complications, and other safety issues in the management of patients undergoing surgical procedures.
Articles
-
-
Prophylactic antibiotic bundle compliance and surgical site infections: an artificial neural network analysis
-
Root causes and outcomes of postoperative pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: a retrospective observational cohort study
-
Intramedullary reaming modality for management of postoperative long bone infection: a prospective randomized controlled trial in 44 patients
-
Standardization of early drain removal following pancreatic resection: proposal of the “Ottawa pancreatic drain algorithm”
-
Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies
-
The 5th anniversary of the "Universal Protocol": pitfalls and pearls revisited
-
Treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients over 60 years of age - which is the ideal modality of primary joint replacement?
-
Current issues in patient safety in surgery: a review
-
A new journal devoted to patient safety in surgery: the time is now!
djvstock / Fotolia
Featured article: Morbidity and mortality meetings to improve patient safety: a survey of 109 consultant surgeons in London, United Kingdom
Morbidity & Mortality (M&M) meetings are a critical component of clinical governance. They have the potential to improve patient outcomes, quality of care, attitudes towards patient safety and they contribute to the education of clinical staff.
In this study, Sinitsky et al evaluated individual surgeons' experience of these meetings and explored their perceived usefulness and barriers to open discussion of adverse outcomes. Findings demonstrated that many surgeons in London do not routinely attended M&M meetings, despite these occurring within 'protected time'.
About the Editor
Sign up to receive article alerts
Patient Safety in Surgery is published continuously online-only and so we encourage you to sign up to receive free email alerts to keep up to date with all of the latest articles by registering here.
Advertisement
Follow
Annual Journal Metrics
-
Speed
42 days to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only
38 days to first decision for all manuscripts
73 days from submission to acceptance
13 days from acceptance to publication
Citation Impact
0.715 - Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)
0.402 - SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)
1.400 - CiteScore
Usage
223,455 Downloads
180 Altmetric mentions
Advertisement
