Skip to content

Advertisement

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact us so we can address the problem.

Erratum to: Assessing the quality of operation notes: a review of 1092 operation notes in 9 UK hospitals

  • 1Email author
Patient Safety in Surgery201610:8

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-016-0096-7

  • Published:

The original article was published in Patient Safety in Surgery 2016 10:5

Erratum

It has come to our attention that there is an error in the author list of this article [1]. In the original article Julia Blackburn was incorrectly listed separately to the Severn Audit and Research Collaborative in Orthopaedics group. The original article has now been updated. The publisher apologises for any inconvenience caused.

Notes

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Academic Clinical Fellow ST4 Trauma & Orthopaedics, Musculoskeletal Research Unit (MRU), Learning & Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK

Reference

  1. Severn Audit and Research Collaborative in Orthopaedics (SARCO). Assessing the quality of operation notes: a review of 1092 operation notes in 9 UK hospitals. Patient Safety in Surgery. 2016;10:5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Severn Audit and Research Collaborative in Orthopaedics (SARCO) 2016

Advertisement