Skip to main content

Erratum to: Assessing the quality of operation notes: a review of 1092 operation notes in 9 UK hospitals

The Original Article was published on 06 February 2016

Erratum

It has come to our attention that there is an error in the author list of this article [1]. In the original article Julia Blackburn was incorrectly listed separately to the Severn Audit and Research Collaborative in Orthopaedics group. The original article has now been updated. The publisher apologises for any inconvenience caused.

Reference

  1. Severn Audit and Research Collaborative in Orthopaedics (SARCO). Assessing the quality of operation notes: a review of 1092 operation notes in 9 UK hospitals. Patient Safety in Surgery. 2016;10:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Consortia

Additional information

The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s13037-016-0093-x.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Severn Audit and Research Collaborative in Orthopaedics (SARCO). Erratum to: Assessing the quality of operation notes: a review of 1092 operation notes in 9 UK hospitals. Patient Saf Surg 10, 8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-016-0096-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-016-0096-7