Skip to main content

Incidence and root causes of surgical site infections after gastrointestinal surgery at a public teaching hospital in Sudan

Abstract

Background

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common healthcare-associated infections and associated with prolonged hospital stays, additional financial burden, and significantly hamper the potential benefits of surgical interventions. Causes of SSIs are multi-factorials and patients undergoing gastrointestinal tract procedures carry a high risk of bacterial contamination. This study aimed to determine the prevalence, associated factors, and causing microorganisms of SSIs among patients undergoing gastrointestinal tract surgeries.

Methods

A hospital based, cross-sectional study conducted at Soba University Hospital in Khartoum, Sudan. We included all patients from all age groups attending the gastrointestinal tract surgical unit between 1st September and 31st December 2017. We collected data about the socio-demographic characteristics, risk factors of SSI, and isolated microorganisms from patients with SSIs. A Chi-square test was conducted to determine the relationship between the independent categorical variables and the occurrence of SSI. The significance level for all analyses was set at p < .05.

Results

A total of 80 participants were included in the study. The mean age was 51 +/- 16 years and most of the patients (67.5%) did not have any chronic illness prior to the surgical operation. Most of them (46.3%) of them underwent large bowel surgery. Twenty-two patients (27.5%) developed SSI post operatively and superficial SSI was the most common type of SSIs (81.8%). Occurrence of SSI was found to be associated with long operation time (p > .001), malignant nature of the disease (p > .001), intra-operative blood loss (p > .001), and intra-operative hypotension (p = .013). The most prevalent microorganism isolated from SSI patients was E coli (47.8%), followed by Enterococcus fecalis (13.0%) and combined Pseudomonas aeruginosa + E coli infection (13.0%).

Conclusions

The results showed a high prevalence of SSIs among patients attending the gastrointestinal tract surgical unit and the most prevalent microorganism isolated from them was E coli. Measures should be taken to reduce the magnitude of SSI by mitigating the identified associated factors.

Introduction

Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most frequent type of healthcare-associated infections, accounting for 14% − 25% of the total hospital-acquired infections [1, 2]. SSI is associated with a prolonged hospital stay, long-term disability, and additional financial burden, and significantly hampers the potential benefits of surgical interventions [3]. Notably, SSI is theoretically preventable but requires a particular investigation of early diagnosis and intervention [3].

The incidence of SSIs can vary across surgical procedures, specialties, and conditions, with a range of 0.1–50.4% as reported in a 2017-systematic review [4]. A prevalence survey in the UK National Health Service (NHS) indicated that approximately 8% of all patients (5743 out of 75,694 patients over a four-month period) admitted to hospital suffered healthcare-associated infections, with 15% of these infections being SSIs, and similar estimates have been found in France [3]. In Africa, the impact of SSIs ranged from 6.8–26% with predominance in the general surgeries [4].

Although there are global variations around the definition of an SSI, the European Commission classified SSIs into superficial incisional surgical site infection, deep incisional surgical site infection, or surgical site infection - organ/space, and the diagnostic criteria include the presence of one of the signs of infection (tenderness, swelling, reddening, and elevated skin temperature), purulent discharge from the incision site, and positive result of microbiological examination of material collected or after the surgical opening of the incision site [5, 6].

While the causes of SSIs are multi-factorial, recognized risk factors include the length of hospital stay, obesity, patient co-morbidities, duration and complexity of the surgery, and higher wound contamination classification [7]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), classified wounds by their level of contamination as Clean (Class 1): which are non infective operative wounds in which no inflammation is encountered, with no involvement of respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary tract, and oropharyngeal cavity; Clean-contaminated (Class 2): operative wounds in which either the respiratory, gastrointestinal or the genitourinary tract is entered under controlled conditions and with the only minor contamination, as resulted from operations involving the biliary tract, appendix, and oropharynx, provided no evidence of infection or a major break in sterile technique is encountered; Contaminated (Class 3): fresh, accidental wounds, resulting from operations with major breaks in sterile technique or gross spillage from the gastrointestinal tract, and incisions in which acute, non purulent (free from pus) inflammation is encountered; and Dirty (Class 4): old traumatic wounds with retained devitalized tissue and those that involve existing clinical infection or perforated viscera [8].

The risk of SSI is related to the level of contamination of the wound as demonstrated in a recent surveillance of surgical infections in NHS hospitals in England, which showed that the SSI risk following gastrointestinal tract procedures (especially large bowel surgery) reached 9.0% in 2018/19 [9]. While SSIs could be prevented by identifying and mitigating the predisposing factors, SSIs still have a significant burden on both the patient and health system in Sub Saharan Africa countries, where resources are limited, and the wound infection rates are higher than developed countries [10, 11]. Moreover, there is a knowledge gap regarding SSIs incidence, related factors and microorganism in Sudan. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the burden, associated factors, and the most prevalent microorganisms of SSIs among patients undergoing gastrointestinal tract surgeries.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

A prospective, hospital based, descriptive cross-sectional study conducted at Soba University Hospital in Khartoum, Sudan during the period between 1st September and 31st December 2017. The Hospital is affiliated with the University of Khartoum and provides a host of therapeutic and diagnostic services at the highest level in Sudan through specialized units served by well trained healthcare staff. The current capacity of the hospital is approximately 500 beds and there are two general surgery units at the department of surgery. One of them is particularly specialized in the gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary conditions. Patients are booked for surgery from the referred clinics and then organized in the elective operations lists.

Data collection and analysis

We included all patients from all age groups attending the gastrointestinal tract surgical unit during the study who underwent surgical procedures. Patients who died after admission to the hospital and before undergoing surgical procedures were excluded from the study. Each patient eligible for the inclusion in this study were enrolled consecutively and followed from the time of admission until time of discharge using a structured questionnaire, which was used to collect data adopted from a variety of literature.

The primary outcomes variable for this study were rate of SSI and type of the causing microorganisms. Diagnosis of SSI was made according to the after-mentioned criteria of the Centres for Diseases Control and Prevention. Data were collected from the medical records of patients including the operational and anesthetic sheets. We collected data about the socio-demographic characteristics, relevant clinical characteristics related to SSIs, and data about the isolated microorganisms from patients with SSIs.

Several patients’ clinical conditions have been described in the literature as risk factors to SSI [4, 12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Based on the literature review and availability of the data, we assessed the following independent variables in this study: site of operation, type of operation, nature of the disease (benign vs. malignant), history of chronic illnesses (hypertension, heart diseases, and diabetes mellitus), surgical wound classification, duration of surgery, type of antibiotics prophylaxis, having bowel preparation prior to surgery, intra-operative blood loss, and intra-operative hypotension. After completion of data collection, data analysis was done using the SPSS software version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A Chi-square test was conducted to determine the relationship between the independent categorical variables and the occurrence of SSI. The significance level for all analyses was set at p < .05.

Results

General characteristics of the participants

A total of 80 participants were included in the study. Patients’ ages ranged from 20 to 98 years and the median age was 52 years (interquartile range: 25 years). 53.8% of them were males and 46.3% were females. Most of the patients (67.5%) did not have any chronic illness prior to the surgical operation and 46.3% of them underwent large bowel surgery. Thirty nine patients (48.8%) underwent clean-contaminated surgeries as well as another 39 patients underwent contaminated surgeries (Table 1).

Regarding preparation to surgery, all of patients received antibiotics prophylaxis preoperatively except one patient and near half of the patients (47.1%) received bowel preparation medications. Half of the patients (50.0%) received 2nd generation cephalosporin as a preoperative antibiotics prophylaxis, whilst 43.8% of them received both 2nd generation cephalosporin and Metronidazol as a preoperative antibiotics prophylaxis. However, most of them (81.2%) did not have documentation for the timing of administration of antibiotics prophylaxis preoperatively. Among the remaining who have complete data, (25%) and (62.5%) were given antibiotics 20 and 30 minutes before the operation, respectively. The majority (95.0%) did not receive second dose of antibiotics (Table 2).

SSI prevalence, associated factors, and isolated microorganisms

Twenty-two patients (27.5%) developed SSI post operatively; eight patients developed SSI in the period of 3–4 days postoperatively, nine patients developed the infection in the period of 5–6 days postoperatively, and five developed the infection one week after the operation. Most of SSI cases (86.8%) were detected during hospital stay periods and the remaining cases were detected in the post-discharge follow-ups. Superficial SSI was the most common type of SSIs (82.6%).

Occurrence of SSI was found to be associated with long operation time of more than three hours (p > .001), malignant surgical diseases (p > .001), intra-operative blood loss (p > .001), and intra-operative hypotension (p = .013). The most prevalent microorganism isolated from SSI patients was E. coli (47.8%), followed by Enterococcus fecalis (13.0%) and combined Pseudomonas aeruginosa + E. coli infection (13.0%) (Table 3).

Table 1 Characteristics of the gastrointestinal surgical procedures done during the study period
Table 2 Risk factors associated with developing an SSI
Table 3 Features and types of microorganisms isolated from patients with SSI

Discussion

Reducing the risk of SSIs is dependent on identifying the risk factors as well as developing the needed measures for prevention and management [29]. An artificial neural network analysis for prediction of SSIs showed that the interaction between the risk factors is complex and depicted that some factors, such as preoperative white blood cell count and wound classification, could be more important than other variables [30].

The results of this study showed that 27.1% of the patients had SSI. Several risk factors were found to be significantly associated with the development of SSI including: malignant nature of the disease, intra-operative blood loss, intra-operative hypotension, and long operation time. Majority of the patients had superficial wound infections, which were discovered mostly during post-operative hospital stay with drainage from the wound site 5–6 days post operatively. Those patients with SSIs were handled according to the standard guidelines and wound dressing twice per day was offered for patients with SSI.

The higher risk of acquiring SSI among patients with malignant diseases compared to patients with benign diseases is reasonable since malignancy is associated with weak immune system and vulnerability to various infections, and it is consistent with studies reported that SSI was observed in 30–60% of patients after colorectal cancer surgeries [5, 16, 17]. The lack of association between SSI and timing of antibiotics prophylaxis in this study is similar to another retrograde cohort study [31]. According to the standard guidelines, antibiotics prophylaxis should be given 60 minutes before the incision in most of types of antibiotics and doubling of the dose should be considered when the duration of operation exceeds 4 hours [32].

There was a significant association between SSI and intra-operative blood loss of more than 500 ml like another study showed the 26.1% of those who had massive intra-operative blood loss developed wound infection [18]. This is relevant since blood loss is directly related to decreased tissue oxygenation and aiding in the development of SSI. Also, intra-operative hypotension is found to be strongly related to SSI as previously reported [19, 20], and this is related to the poor wound perfusion resulting from intra-operative hypotension.

The association between SSI and long duration of operation of more than 180 min match a systematic review that showed the same results in most of its studies [21]. It has been demonstrated that there was an 80% increase in likelihood of SSI with surgeries longer (versus shorter) than three hours [4]. Prolonged operative time allows time for over- handling the wound edges and also contact with contaminated fluids coming out of the surgical field.

The most prevalent micro-organisms isolated were E coli and Enterococcus fecalis, whilst other studies showed that Staphylococcus aureus was the most common isolated bacteria from different wound types [33, 34]. A recent meta-analysis found that 30.6% of SSI cases in Ethiopia were caused by Staphylococcus aureus, which was like other reports from India, Nigeria, and Uganda [35]. Also, Pseudomonas aeruginosa are commonly isolated in infected wounds following surgeries and burns, whereas Enterobacteriaceae are commonly isolated from wounds in immune compromised patients and abdominal surgeries [33, 34]. These virulent isolated microorganisms need to be put in high consideration and further elaboration to be done regarding this issue.

Conclusion

The results showed a high prevalence of SSI among patients attending the gastrointestinal tract surgical unit and it was associated with the malignant diseases, intra-operative blood loss, intra-operative hypotension, presence of surgical drains, and long operative duration. The most prevalent microorganisms isolated were E coli, Enterococcus fecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Measures should be taken to decrease intra-operative blood loss, reduce the waste of time due to any cause intra-operatively so as to reduce the overall duration of operation.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

SSI:

Surgical site infections

References

  1. 1.

    Warren DK, Nickel KB, Wallace AE, Mines D, Tian F, Symons WJ, Fraser VJ, Olsen MA. Risk factors for surgical site infection after cholecystectomy. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017 Spring;4(2):ofx036.

  2. 2.

    Elbur AI, Y MA, El-Sayed ASA, Abdel-Rahman ME. Prophylactic Antibiotics and Wound Infection. Journal of Clinical Diagnostic Research: JCDR. 2013;7(12):2747–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Liu S, Miao J, Wang G, Wang M, Wu X, Guo K, Feng M, Guan W, Ren J. Risk factors for postoperative surgical site infections in patients with Crohn’s disease receiving definitive bowel resection. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):9828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cheng H, Chen BP-H, Soleas IM, Ferko NC, Cameron CG, Hinoul P. Prolonged Operative Duration Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review. Surgical Infections. 2017;18(6):722–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Banaszkiewicz Z, Cierzniakowska K, Tojek K, Kozlowska E, Jawien A. Surgical site infection among patients after colorectal cancer surgery. Pol Przegl Chir. 2017 Feb;28(1):9–15. 89.

  6. 6.

    Samantha K. Classification of Surgical Site Infections. Wound types. December 15th, 2016.

  7. 7.

    Norman G, Atkinson RA, Smith TA, Rowlands C, Rithalia AD, Crosbie EJ, Dumvelli JC. Intracavity lavage and wound irrigation for prevention of surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;10:CD012234.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Onyekwelu I, Yakkanti R, Protzer L, Pinkston CM, Tucker C, Seligson D. Surgical Wound Classification and Surgical Site Infections in the Orthopaedic Patient. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2017;1(3):e022.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Troughton R, Birgand G, Johnson AP, Naylor N, Gharbi M, Aylin P, Hopkins S, Jaffer U, Holmes A. Mapping national surveillance of surgical site infections in England: needs and priorities. The Journal of Hospital Infection. 2018. (100;4), P378-385.

  10. 10.

    Mezemir R, Seid A, Gishu T, Demas T, Gize A. Prevalence and root causes of surgical site infections at an academic trauma and burn center in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Patient Saf Surg. 2020;14:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Fisha K, Azage M, Mulat G, Tamirat KS. The prevalence and root causes of surgical site infections in public versus private hospitals in Ethiopia: a retrospective observational cohort study. Patient Saf Surg. 2019;13:26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Abu-Ashour W, Twells L, Valcour J, Randell A, Donnan J, Howse P, Gambell JM. The association between diabetes mellitus and incident infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017;5(1):e000336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zimlichman E, Henderson D, Tamir O, Franz C, Song P, Yamin CK, Carol Keohane CR, Denham, David W, Bates. Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system: A meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(22):2039–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Joynt KE, Jha AK. Characteristics of hospitals receiving penalties under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. JAMA. 2013;309:342–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Martin ET, Kaye KS, Knott C, Nguyen H, Santarossa M, Evans R, Bertran J, Jaber L. Diabetes and risk of surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37(1):88–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Dale W, Bratzler E, Patchen Dellinger KM, Olsen TM, Perl PG, Auwaerter, Maureen K, Bolon DN, Fish LM, Napolitano RG, Sawyer D, Slain JP, Steinberg RA, Weinstein. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; Infectious Disease Society of America; Surgical Infection Society; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2013; 70: 195–283.

  17. 17.

    Nelson RL, Gladman E, Barbateskovic M. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;9(5):CD001181.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Leylek M, Poliquin V, Al-Wazzan A, Dean E, Altman AD. Postoperative Infection in the Setting of Massive Intraoperative Blood Loss. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016;38(12):1110–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ishikawa K, Kusumi T, Hosokawa M, Nishida Y, Sumikawa S, Furukawa H. Incisional Surgical Site Infection after Elective Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer. International Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2014:419712.

  20. 20.

    Smith RL, Bohl JK, McElearney ST, Friel CM, Barclay MM, Sawyer RG, Foley FE. Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann Surg. 2004;239(5):599–605. discussion 605-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Korol E, Johnston K, Waser N, Sifakis F, Jafri HS, Lo M, Kyao MH. A systematic review of risk factors associated with surgical site infections among surgical patients. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Walmsley PJ, Kelly MB, Hill RM, Brenkel I. A prospective, randomised, controlled trial of the use of drains in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2005;87:1397–401.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Dougherty SH, Simmons RL. The biology and practice of surgical drains. Part 1. Curr Probl Surg. 1992;29:559–623.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Felippe WA, Werneck GL, Santoro-Lopes G. Surgical site infection among women discharged with a drain in situ after breast cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2007;31:2293–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Vilar-Compte D, Mohar A, Sandoval S, de la Rosa M, Gordillo P, Volkow P. Surgical site infections at the National Cancer Institute in Mexico: a case-control study. Am J Infect Control. 2000;28(1):14–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Reiffel AJ, Barie PS, Spector JA. A Multi-Disciplinary Review of the Potential Association between Closed-Suction Drains and Surgical Site Infection. Surgical Infections. 2013;14(3):244–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mayon-White RT, Ducel G, Kereselidze T, Tikomirov E. An international survey of the prevalence of hospital-acquired infection. J Hosp Infect. 1988;11:43–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kunin CM. Resistance to antimicrobial drugs—a worldwide calamity. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:557–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ryu M, Yoo H, Choi YK. National hospital quality measures for surgical site infections in South Korea: a survey among 20 expert physicians. Patient Saf Surg. 2020;14:29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Walczak S, Davila M, Velanovich V. Prophylactic antibiotic bundle compliance and surgical site infections: an artificial neural network analysis. Patient Saf Surg. 2019;13:41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hawn MT, Richman JS, Vick CC, Deierhoi RJ, Graham LA, Henderson WG, Itani KMF. Timing of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infection. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(7):649–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    De Jonge SW, Gans SL, Atema JJ, Solomkin JS, Dellinger PE, Boermeester MA. Timing of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in 54,552 patients and the risk of surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hospenthal. DR, ed. Medicine. 2017;96(29):e6903.

  33. 33.

    Taiwo S, Okesina A, Onile B. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacteria isolated from infected wounds at the University of Illorine teaching Hospital. Afr J Exp Exp Microbiol. 2002;3:13–6.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Nancy A, Kassam, Damian J, Damian D, Kajeguka B, Nyombi, Gibson S. Kibiki. Spectrum and antibiogram of bacteria isolated from patients presenting with infected wounds in a Tertiary Hospital, northern Tanzania. BMC Research Notes.2017 Dec 20.

  35. 35.

    Birhanu Y, Endalamaw A. Surgical site infection and pathogens in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Saf Surg. 2020;14:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No fund.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

(RH, WM) Involved in the conception of the research idea and data collection; (RH, SM) analyzed data; All authors interpreted the results and drafted the manuscript. All authors revised and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rawan Sharaf Eldein Elamein Hassan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ministry of Health, Khartoum, Sudan. Permission for conducting this study was obtained from the head department of surgery at the hospital. Confidentiality of the study participants was maintained.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassan, R.S.E.E., Osman, S.O.S., Aabdeen, M.A.S. et al. Incidence and root causes of surgical site infections after gastrointestinal surgery at a public teaching hospital in Sudan. Patient Saf Surg 14, 45 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-020-00272-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Surgical site infections
  • SSI
  • gastrointestinal tract
  • risk factors
\